Governed knowledge workspace

Ask AWA. Get governed answers.

AWA turns internal sources into cited answers, editable work and reusable organizational methods.

Layered architecture representing protected enterprise knowledge

Built for real work, not an AI showcase

03 weeksProposed pilot frame
01 workflowRepeated at least weekly
By departmentAccess and oversight
VietnameseQuestions, sources and outputs
AWA
Product concept
Executive workspaceCurrent access applied
Create this quarter's risk brief for the executive committee.
AWA

Four risks require a decision this week

AWA checked 18 allowed sources, recomputed the figures and preserved the requester's access perimeter.

18 approved sourcesFigures verified

The knowledge exists. Work still waits.

People wait for files, ask former owners, then move data to outside AI tools to finish reports. Every handoff adds risk and loses method.

From question to deliverable

One complete work loop inside the organization’s governed knowledge space.

Ask without waiting for a file

AWA searches every source you are allowed to use and answers with citations that open the supporting page or sheet.

Never retrieve what you cannot see

Policy is applied before data reaches retrieval, analysis or the model. Out-of-scope results do not appear.

Produce the output in place

Turn an answer into reports, tables and editable work that can be shared and exported without moving data to another tool.

Keep the method

Save successful work as a Flow. Teams reuse an approved version and improve it through reviewed corrections.

Governance at the foundation

Access follows every request

Users, documents, numeric tables, Artifacts and Flows are checked by organization, department, classification and sharing rules.

AWA
UserVerified identity and department
PolicyClassification and scope applied
Allowed sourcesOnly eligible content enters the work session
AnswerCitations and authoritative receipts are retained

Three moments that turn governance into an advantage

AWA does not merely claim to be safe. People can see permissions, evidence and deliverables at every step.

Evidence-backed answer

Ask once. See the sources, math and scope.

Compare this quarter's revenue with plan and identify where action is required.
Searched governed knowledge
Recomputed figures from source tables

Revenue is 3.2% above plan. Two southern-region receivables require action before the 15th.

FY26 planQ2 revenue ledgerReceivables report
Blocked before retrieval

Out-of-scope information never reaches the model.

Open Finance's confidential margin report.
Request outside your access perimeter

AWA stops the request at the policy layer. No excerpt, figure or document name is disclosed.

FIN-CONFIDENTIAL
Artifacts live with the work

From answer to delivery-ready document.

Create, edit, share and review without moving organizational data into another workspace.

Version 7
64
Decisions required

Q2 operational risk report

Resolve two overdue receivables

Keep cost envelope inside approved range

Owners confirm actions before Friday

Shared with 6 people4 comments

Finish the work, not just the chat

Create structured Artifacts, revise through immutable versions, collaborate with control and export the result for delivery.

Cited reportsEditable tablesVersion historyNamed sharing
Product demo video placeholderSuggested: 90 seconds from question to finished report

Do it well once. Let the team reuse it.

A Flow captures a method that worked, passes review, and always runs with the current user’s access.

Complete

Solve a real task inside AWA.

Capture

Turn the steps used into a personal Flow.

Approve

An eligible reviewer approves the exact version.

Reuse

The team runs it with current data and access.

Your data. Your model. Every layer under control.

AWA is designed for an architecture agreed with each organization, from storage and models to policy, audit and connectors.

Organization isolation
Selectable model layer
External connectors off by default
Retrieval and action audit trail

Bounded pilot, clear evidence

Prove value on one real workflow

AWA prepares users, documents and access before day one. Three weeks of real use gives both sides evidence to expand, revise or stop.

Prepare

Choose the workflow, interview users, organize sources and approve access.

Use

Users complete weekly work and give direct feedback.

Improve

Fix one focused issue each week without losing created work.

Decide

Review completion, editing effort, exports and access failures.

Team photography placeholder

Work directly with the implementation team

The pilot is supported from workflow discovery through access setup, onboarding and evidence review.

[Names, roles and portraits to be added]

Frequently asked questions

Is AWA an internal chatbot?

It goes further. Cited Q&A is the entry point. Artifacts and Flows help people finish work and retain the organization’s method.

How does AWA prevent disclosure?

Access rules are applied before content reaches retrieval, numeric analysis or the model. Out-of-scope resources are hidden and important actions leave receipts.

What does a pilot require?

One workflow repeated at least weekly, real users, real documents, an access approver and a regular feedback loop.

Must we replace our current systems?

No. The pilot starts with one workflow and an approved source set. Long-term integration is decided after evidence exists.

Is our data used to train a shared model?

AWA is intended for configurations where the organization controls data and the model layer. Storage, provider and training commitments are documented in the pilot design.

How is the pilot evaluated?

By task completion, editing effort before delivery, exports, Flow usefulness and every reported access failure.

Choose one workflow. Prove it in three weeks.

Start with a small group, approved sources and decision criteria agreed from day one.